For Authors

Peer Review Process

Editorial Evaluation

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

Ensuring international scholarly quality, credibility and academic integrity across all submitted manuscripts.

The international journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and credibility of published work.
All submitted manuscripts are initially screened by the editorial team for relevance and originality.
Suitable manuscripts are then assigned to two or more expert reviewers in the respective field.
The identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the process.
Based on reviewers’ comments, the manuscript may be accepted, revised, or rejected.
Authors are provided constructive feedback to improve the quality of their research.
The editorial board makes the final decision based on reviewers’ recommendations.
This process ensures that only high-quality, ethically sound, and impactful research is published.

Review Pathway

A transparent and confidential workflow safeguarding objective evaluation.

Step 01

Author submits original paper along with blinded file and declaration forms.

Step 02

Editorial office assesses journal scope, manuscript structure, and similarity index.

Step 03

Manuscript assigned to two or more independent external subject matter experts.

Step 04

Confidential peer evaluation ensuring complete mutual anonymity of all parties.

Step 05

Consolidated scholarly critique, recommendations, and scoring returned to editors.

Step 06

Authors address reviewer suggestions and submit revised manuscript where required.

Step 07

Editorial board determines final decision: Acceptance, Revision, or Rejection.

Step 08

Final proofreading, typesetting, and formal publication in the designated issue.

Authors should review all guidelines and policies before submitting their manuscript.